This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
No matter how enthusiastically I participated in the training, once I walked out the door it became difficult to maintain the momentum of what I’d learned. Have an “afteractionreview” to allow them to debrief on what they learned and how they’ll use that learning in the future. I was a spectator.
Here are some common pitfalls that should be avoided in any form of reflective exercise: No Actions, No Results: In many other methodologies and cultures, Hansei is termed differently, like retrospectives in Scrum and AfterActionReviews in American Culture (developed by US Army).
Some knowledge transfer methods to consider are mentoring, social networks, Communities of Practice, AfterActionReviews, and storytelling programs. We recommend you pilot each element of your program, from the sign-in sheet to the evaluation form to the website where participants enroll in the program.
If you fall short, a reasonable first place to start with an “after-action-review” is, What could you (the leader) have done differently? You may not want to be judged, or think it is fair, but you will be. For example: Your department or division signed up to deliver certain outcomes.
” Here’s how it worked: At the beginning of each program, participants identified a challenging and complex problem in their business or function (e.g., For example, one participant focused on creating a new pricing scheme. product pricing, operational efficiency, customer service, etc.). One experiment generated a 2.6%
Then periodically do "after-actionreviews" to evaluate how things are going and identify process adjustments and training needs. Simplify the work to the greatest extent possible, ideally so tasks are assigned to sub-groups of two or three team members. Commit to a communication charter.
More-formal methods, such as after-actionreviews, are useful too. Extending this participation to agile talent is a potentially powerful opportunity for young professionals to see new or alternative approaches to problem solving. Involve Experts as Part of the Brain Trust.
The best technique I’ve seen for structuring these coaching sessions may be the after-actionreview (AAR) procedure developed by the U.S. AAR is a structured review or debrief process for analyzing what happened, why it happened, and how it can be done better by the participants and those responsible.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content