This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In my view, the #1 killer element is groupthink. That phenomenon, first described by Jerry B Harvey in his article ‘The Abilene Paradox’, highlighted his views on consensus inertia. Ensure your team consensus is real, rather than imagined, by regularly reflecting on the values that underpin your declared purpose. What to do now?
GUEST POST from Greg Satell “I hate consensus,” legendary Silicon Valley coach Bill Campbell used to growl. The problem, as the authors explain in the book, Trillion Dollar Coach, wasn’t that he didn’t want people to get along, but that an easy consensus often leads to groupthink and inferior decisions.
That can result in groupthink. In other cases, group consensus or majority rule is used to make the decision. Strive to reach consensus. Conflicts occur and are handled in a professional manner. There is a foundation of trust and psychological safety. Without trust, people hold back their true thoughts and feelings. Speak up.
To explain further, in a crisis, using diverse perspectives enables the unthinkable to be brought to the table, it avoids groupthink and enables more effective solutions. They gather differing perspectives and then make the decisions, with the best interests of the organization (not their careers) in mind, without needing a full consensus.”
Groupthink is stealth. Diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) combat groupthink, which is a mode of thinking that occurs when individuals of a highly cohesive, insular group or an in-group strive for consensus and might avoid or override alternate viewpoints, ideas, actions, or dissent.
Best Idea, Not Consensus. The goal of consensus leads to “groupthink” and inferior decisions. Have a structure for one-on-one’s and take the time to prepare for them, as they are the best way to help people be more effective and to grow. There isn’t a head at the Round Table , but there is a throne behind it.
The friction of ideas and concepts rubbing against each other can produce a spark of creativity that you can’t get in a consensus environment. When everyone focuses on agreeing and trying to please, you’ll soon find yourself on the Bus to Abilene , a special kind of purgatory for specialists in groupthink. Patton Click To Tweet.
It transpired that people were using their peers’ preferences as a guidepost for the value they should place on punishment, while the group consensus also emboldened them to make decisions that conformed to that consensus. ” Adaptive conformity. . ” Adaptive conformity.
Groupthink In an environment where conformity is valued over critical thinking, leaders may disregard their own views or skepticism to avoid conflict. False Consensus Effect Leaders suffering from the false consensus effect overestimate the extent to which others share their opinions and beliefs.
Groupthink: The Consensus Conundrum The Trap: The desire for group harmony can lead to unchallenged decision-making and potentially flawed outcomes. Be Ready to Pivot: Embrace the courage to discontinue projects when necessary.
In articles in both the New York Times and The New Yorker earlier this year, the concept of brainstorming as introduced in the 1940's by Alex Osborn has been attacked as ineffective and linked to the concept of " Groupthink.". Suffice it to say, we dislike consensus-based "Groupthink" as much as the next person.
Groupthink In an environment where conformity is valued over critical thinking, leaders may disregard their own views or skepticism to avoid conflict. False Consensus Effect Leaders suffering from the false consensus effect overestimate the extent to which others share their opinions and beliefs.
Groupthink: The Consensus Conundrum The Trap: The desire for group harmony can lead to unchallenged decision-making and potentially flawed outcomes. Be Ready to Pivot: Embrace the courage to discontinue projects when necessary.
This is the opposite of groupthink, the creativity-killing phenomenon of too much agreement and too similar perspectives that often paralyzes otherwise great teams. Consensus comes quickly, and only later, when we fail and wonder why, do we realize that the easy agreements and shared conclusions doomed us from the start.
Yale psychologist Irving Janis used the debacle to coin the term “groupthink,” which refers to a psychological drive for consensus at any cost that suppresses dissent and appraisal of alternatives. The idea of instilling candid debate to avoid groupthink has become a guiding principle in many business school classrooms and boardrooms.
Ultimately, enough hateful content has been published to show that the online mob has developed a case of groupthink that at times seemed to parallel the mob mentality that fueled the riot itself. We must answer open questions about when and how our social information can be used. Is it whenever the information is posted publicly?
As General Stan McChrystal, one of the leaders of the military's move to networks, said in a recent TED Talk : "Instead of giving orders, you're now building consensus and you're building a sense of shared purpose.". (3) Conformity creates groupthink, stifling innovation and organizational resilience. 3) Create shared consciousness.
The story suggests Amazon places immense importance on defining team players not as people who go along with the group’s consensus, or who support the status quo, but instead as those who add new ideas and perspectives. In short, Amazon discourages conformity and combats groupthink. Disruptive thinking is welcome.
Many of us are familiar with the hazards of Groupthink - when teams or organizations operate on autopilot and feel a general false sense of invulnerability. In some rare cases, individuals are able to push back against team consensus and help organizations recognize and proactively respond to changes in the competitive landscape.
Most business decisions are collaborative, which mean groupthink and consensus work to compound our individual biases. Behavioral economists have uncovered a range of mental shortcuts and cognitive biases that distort our perceptions and hide better choices from us.
Taken together, all of us establish a “consensus” view on the markets. ” In other words, they didn’t want to hear the groupthink. When I worked on Wall Street, my professional circle was initially limited to other folks in the financial services sector: bankers, traders, analysts, economists.
Among the things he discussed in his keynote was how to combat groupthink. Groupthink may be the most dangerous force running rampant within organizations today. Here’s a definition of it from Psychology Today : Groupthink occurs when a group values harmony and coherence over accurate analysis and critical evaluation.
You’ll also want team members who excel in interpersonal dynamics such as building consensus, giving feedback, communicating in groups, and motivating others. You may need people with relevant experience within a specific industry, the ability to perform a particular technical skill, or a talent for writing or presentation.
In exploring the problem of groupthink, the research of Charlan Nemeth reveals how easily “majority thinking” squeezes out “minority thinking.” A constricted path also occurs when a strong counter-position is tabled without being challenged.
In exploring the problem of groupthink, the research of Charlan Nemeth reveals how easily “majority thinking” squeezes out “minority thinking.” A constricted path also occurs when a strong counter-position is tabled without being challenged.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content