This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Maybe what defines effective leadership is about more than just you. This inquisitive contemplation brought forth the idea of Contingencytheory, and moved the field of leadershiptheory forward by another drastic step. Leadershipstyle is assessed using a measure called the Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) scale.
James MacGregor Burns first introduced the concepts of transformational leadership when studying political leaders, but this term is now used when studying organizations as well. Burns described two leadershipstyles: transactional and transformational. It also solidified the need to study followers in leadership research.
In the same manner, situational leadershiptheory builds upon contingencytheory. Situational leadership defines four leadershipstyles: S1 (high-directive but low-supportive), S2 (high-directive and high-supportive), S3 (low-directive but high supportive) and S4 (low-directive and low-supportive).
Path-goal theory is half leadership, half motivational theory. It was developed to explain how leaders motivate their followers toward a determined end. Path-goal theory is a contingencytheory, in that it predicts how leaders style will interact with follower needs and the nature of the task.
PARTICIPATIVE LEADERSHIPTHEORY. The id ea of a participative leadershipstyle arises from the work of Dr. Rensis Likert in 1967. Likert proposed several types of leadershipstyles including exploitative authoritative, benevolent authoritative, consultative, and participative.
During the 20th century, researchers began to focus on the situational context of leadership leading to the development of contingencytheories which suggest that different leadershipstyles are effective in different situations. Which of those theories do you agree with? Disagree with?
Their research leads to a myriad of research attempting to define leadership behaviors that worked in every situation. However, the results of this research are inconclusive, suggesting that there is not one best style of effective leadership. Intro to LeadershipTheory. Why Theory. A Word on Theory.
Leadershiptheories are mainly categorized into Trait Theory, Behaviour Theory, and ContingencyTheory. Trait theory, also known as the ‘great man’ theory, is focused on the characteristics of leaders. Some argue that leadershipstyles are fixed, something that has caused differing opinions.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content