This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This inquisitive contemplation brought forth the idea of Contingencytheory, and moved the field of leadership theory forward by another drastic step. Developed by Fielder, Contingencytheory examines the leader in conjunction with the situation the leader is in. Contingencytheory is merely predictive.
Path-goal theory is half leadership, half motivationaltheory. It was developed to explain how leaders motivate their followers toward a determined end. Path-goal theory is a contingencytheory, in that it predicts how leaders style will interact with follower needs and the nature of the task.
Bass’ work established that transformational leaders demonstrate four factors: individual consideration, intellectual stimulation, inspirational motivation (charismatic leadership) and idealized influence. Transformational leadership was the first developed and validate theory to emphasis morals and values in leadership.
This meant that trait theory was not particularly useful for developing new leaders who lack those traits. Similar to trait theory, skills theories are leader-centric, focused on what characteristics about leaders make them effective. Intro to Leadership Theory. Why Theory. A Word on Theory.
This theory was a hot topic in the mid-1970s and takes its roots in the larger social exchange theory, a social psychological perspective that explains social change and stability as a process of negotiated exchanges between parties. CONTINGENCYTHEORY OF LEADERSHIP. PATH-GOAL THEORY OF LEADERSHIP.
Later theories emphasized the behavior of leaders, including the contrast of task-oriented and people-oriented styles. This theory argues that effective leaders not only provide direction and guidance, but also act as role models and catalysts that inspire their followers to transcend their own self-interests for the greater good.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content