This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Leading people in risky environments is not a game with a reset button, a goldenparachute, or a bailout clause. To an outsider, it might seem that the goal of such training and preparation is to provide leaders with an endless series of templates that prescribe exactly what to do to mitigate risk in any given scenario.
Today's world of bailouts, goldenparachutes, sky-high financial-sector salaries — while middle incomes stagnate — seems to be exactly the reverse. The eye of this perfect storm is extreme income inequality that makes the Glided Age look Leninist: London's the most unequal city in the developed world.
Business by now has a well-developed playbook for dealing with such sustainability issues. Procter & Gamble did this when it recently set a goal that, by 2050, zero per cent of its packaging would wind up in landfills. It’s time to recognize that income inequality is a sustainability issue, too. Yes, Switzerland. They can ….
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content