This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In any work environment, toxic work cultures have become a pressing concern for organizations. Toxicity in the workplace affects employees’ well-being and morale and significantly impacts organizational effectiveness and profitability. This article explores the effects of toxic work cultures on individuals and the organization, shedding light on the detrimental consequences of such environments.
It’s increasingly common for employees and consumers alike to have high expectations of companies in terms of their social and environmental behavior. A recent study from Kellogg explores whether consumer boycotts actually hurt companies enough to trigger change. The researchers explain that things are seldom as simple as one group choosing to stop buying from a particular company, as it’s equally possible that an opposing group may increase their support to counter this initial move
Many of us can recount “sliding door” moments where our lives may have taken a very different path if we had chosen other options. These are examples of what are known as “counterfactual thinking”, and research from Kellogg outlines that such thinking can go beyond our personal and professional lives. The researchers explored how counterfactual thinking operates politically and asked participants what they thought would happen to the world if politicians behaved different
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content