This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The thing you want to be these days is a “fastfollower.” So all you have to do is look at the industry you are in and identify all the things that are wrong with it….Next, Next, you must begin to study how the solution to that problem will impact you, and find out whether you have any ability to solve it on your own.
Even the swiftest of fastfollowers will struggle to not choke on the dust of first movers in today’s world. The Holy Grail of enterprise sustainability is business model reimagination and reinvention – not digital transformation – at least how many businesses are attempting it.
Many successful bloggers today were not necessarily first-movers, but rather fast-followers able to leap frog the early adopters. In fact, blogging has been around long enough we’re now starting to experience the second and third comings of those who once abandoned their blogs only to come back again. Where Are We Now?
The speed of technology advances in the market are making the old paradigm of first mover versus fastfollower largely irrelevant – every business must now become some version of a first mover. What has changed is the pace and scale at which businesses must innovate to remain competitive in a digital world.
Is the advantage to the "first mover" or should you be a "fastfollower"? But make sure that when you say that you want to be a fastfollower you aren't really saying, "Can't I just go back to running my core business?" There certainly is circumstantial evidence supporting both camps.
Move fast, follow momentum – The future is always changing. You are able to take challenges on because you see that there’s nothing to lose. If we think we are big and significant, our risks will be small and insignificant. Bobby is frequently asked what the future in 5 years will look like.
In many cases, incumbent companies don’t want to spend a lot of money on R&D, so they wait to see a technology develop and become more widely adopted, and then seek to be fastfollowers. While smart on paper, this strategy has become much harder to implement successfully in the digital age.
Fair or not, Microsoft has long had a reputation for being a fastfollower. What I love about the Xbox Live story is that it proves that you can teach an old dog new tricks. More specifically, it shows that big, established incumbents can drive category creation.
Fair or not, Microsoft has long had a reputation for being a fastfollower. What I love about the Xbox Live story is that it proves that you can teach an old dog new tricks. More specifically, it shows that big, established incumbents can drive category creation.
Market leaders and fastfollowers seek transformational change; cautious adopters and laggards dip their toe into incremental change. Market leaders and cautious adopters proactively seek change; fastfollowers and laggards take a reactive approach. Organizational DNA. See accompanying chart.)
There is still a debate in strategy circles about whether it is better to be the first mover or a fastfollower, and whether missing out on the first wave of disruptive innovation means falling behind forever.
But don't count them out for long; if there's one thing Chinese companies are good at, it's implementing a "fastfollower" strategy. At the corporate level, they're looking to the U.S. and the West for best practices.
Samsung has built its name over the past two decades on being the world's greatest FastFollower. That would be a fundamental shift in strategy, and one Samsung has shown little interest in making. Until recently, this wasn't such a big deal.
In my experience, most companies are risk-averse and like to fashion themselves as great “fastfollowers.” But Kruschwitz makes an important point: “Being a fastfollower on climate change…may be more complex and require longer lead times than most companies are anticipating.” That’s exactly right.
But dont count them out for long; if theres one thing Chinese companies are good at, its implementing a "fastfollower" strategy. But dont count them out for long; if theres one thing Chinese companies are good at, its implementing a "fastfollower" strategy. At the corporate level, theyre looking to the U.S.
Even when Bezos appears to be a fastfollower, he's attempting to generate leapfrog momentum. Amazon's ability to create and coordinate a constellation of partners, suppliers and lead users to consistently generate new value goes beyond the remarkable.
A version of this question came up, and my answer was to always be one step ahead of fast-followers by having a robust pipeline that kept people on their toes. How should companies hedge against the practice of copying your products as you go into those markets? IKEA is a great example of this.
Despite what many think, there are not generically great ways to win — e.g., being a first mover or a fastfollower or a branded player or a cost leader. Moreover, no meaningful How to Win choice exists outside the context of a particular Where to Play.
More often than not, the real "speed" challenge most leaderships face is quickly determining whether they're trying to better follow, lead or transform the customers and clients they have. Being a "fastfollower" is much easier to manage than being a "fast transformer."
It is possible, for example, to point to the same data and argue that because the developing countries are getting richer, what they want out of the global economic system will come to more closely match the preferences of today's rich countries. This convergence hypothesis is reassuring on many fronts.
More importantly, by changing your organization's leadership development mindset, you can create the momentum needed to build a talent pipeline that will keep your organization strong as you grow, and grow fast. Follow the Scaling Social Impact insight center on Twitter @ScalingSocial and register to stay informed and give us feedback.
But Samsung’s new mobile wallet strategy may be a sign that they are finally becoming a true leader and shedding their image as a fastfollower. Its foray into this industry comes on the heels of product entries by Google and Apple.
Sprints encourage fastfollow-up. The team could have endlessly debated the merits of each approach until everyone agreed on one, or just gone with the CEO’s hunch, but instead they launched a sprint to prototype and test both. After Friday’s customer test, the results were clear: the simpler marketing was more effective.
The contrast could not be clearer: Amazon – fearlessly making big, risky bets like a serial entrepreneur; and Microsoft, eschewing disruptive innovation in favor of remaining the “ fastfollower ” it has always been, wringing profit from previously proven technologies.
“This is one of the risks of a fast-follower strategy,” Soledad said. .” After a pause, the nose ring guy spoke again. “Still doesn’t make sense to me. Something’s fishy.” ” Miguel put his head in his hands. “Consumers assume the lower-priced product is lower quality.”
For example, new product development may be the lifeblood of a consumer products company—and thus need to be cultivated and resourced carefully—while in a low-cost producer, or fastfollower company, product development may be only a nice-to-have activity.
They are planning to be “fastfollowers” — a strategy that has worked with most information technologies. While some companies — most large banks, Ford and GM, Pfizer, and virtually all tech firms — are aggressively adopting artificial intelligence, many are not. We think this is a bad idea.
Further, while some start-ups legitimately have the potential to change the world, many more are fastfollowers looking for a "quick flip." Sure, there are entrepreneurs like Mason or Zuckerberg who win big. But the vast majority of new businesses fail. Corporate innovation?
China's brilliant "FastFollower" innovation policy is generating the biggest transfer of technology in history. It isn't producing results in terms of new companies, jobs, or economic growth in general, yet billions more flow into NIH and universities every year.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content